
Committee Overview
Committee Overview
Yale Model United Nations Singapore is dedicated to providing an inclusive learning experience tailored to the unique needs and abilities of every delegate. For this iteration of YMUNS, we will be providing General Assemblies (GAs), Economic and Social Councils (ECOSOCs), Specialized, and Crisis committees.
Committee topics span a range of subjects with an emphasis on delegate education and learning. Certain committees will be designated for more advanced delegates to challenge accomplished delegates. All chairs are well-equipped to navigate delegates through the YMUNS committee process.
Please feel free to reach out to dg.committees@ymuns.org with any questions regarding committees.
General Assemblies (GA)
General Assemblies (GA) are the committees most similar to those in the United Nations. Delegates will represent a variety of nations in trying to resolve large-scale issues.
-
Topic 1: Intelligence Gathering, Espionage, and International Security
Espionage has always been a central feature of statecraft, but in the 21st century its scope and impact have expanded dramatically. From covert surveillance programs to cyber instructions targeting government databases, espionage now blurs the line between traditional intelligence gathering and acts of aggression. While most states engage in intelligence operations, the practice is rarely addressed openly in international law. Espionage can provide early warnings of threats and deter terrorism, yet it can also undermine trust between states, violate sovereignty, and raise concerns about human rights when surveillance targets civilians. International law provides little clarity on where to draw the line. Should espionage remain an accepted gray zone practice or should clearer international norms govern its limit? How should the global community address new forms of cyber espionage, mass surveillance, and interference with diplomatic communications?
Topic 2: Weaponization of Outer Space
Since the Space Age, orbit has been seen as a domain for peaceful exploration. Yet as satellites have become essential for communication, navigation, and defense, outer space is increasingly viewed as a potential battlefield. Tests of anti-satellite weapons by several states have already created dangerous debris, threatening astronauts and vital space infrastructure. The 1967 Outer Space Treaty bans the placement of weapons of mass destruction in orbit but leaves many loopholes especially regarding conventional weapons and military satellites. With more states and private actors entering space, the risk of an arms race is growing. The debate centers on whether new rules and verification measures are needed to prevent militarization, and how to balance security concerns with the peaceful use of space as a shared global space.
-
Topic 1: The Human and Social Impacts of Plastic Pollution
Plastic pollution has become one of the most pressing environmental and humanitarian challenges of the 21st century. While much attention has been given to its ecological effects, the human and social consequences are equally severe. Around the world, communities that depend on agriculture, fishing, and tourism face alarming threats to their livelihoods and health as plastic waste infiltrates food chains, water supplies, and local economies. Inadequate waste management systems and the global export of plastic waste have intensified these challenges, disproportionately affecting low-income and marginalized populations while raising questions about global accountability and the ethics of consumption in an increasingly interconnected world. In this committee, delegates will be challenged to examine solutions that balance environmental responsibility with social justice in order to protect the planet and the people who inhabit it.
Topic 2: Indigenous Rights and Green Colonialism in Southeast Asia
Across Southeast Asia, indigenous communities stand at the frontlines of rapid economic development and environmental change. Projects like large-scale mining, logging, dam construction, and agricultural expansion are often pursued under the banner of sustainability or national progress, but have led to displacement, cultural loss, exploitation, and environmental devastation to indigenous peoples across Southeast Asia. As the region accelerates its transition toward renewable energy and climate adaptation, the challenge of green colonialism grows more urgent. In this committee, delegates will examine how governments and corporations can promote economic and environmental progress without compromising the sovereignty, rights, and livelihoods of indigenous peoples in Southeast Asia. The transition toward a greener future must be a just and inclusive one–ensuring that the pursuit of sustainability does not repeat the same patterns of dispossession that have persisted throughout history.
-
Topic 1: Statelessness and the Protection of Displaced Peoples in Southeast Asia
To be without a country is to be invisible—to the law, to the state, and often, to the world. Across Southeast Asia, hundreds of thousands remain stateless: the Rohingya denied recognition in Myanmar, hill tribes lacking documentation in Thailand, and children born in refugee camps across borders. Their lives are marked by displacement, legal limbo, and a daily struggle to access basic rights. In this committee, delegates will confront the complex political and historical forces that produce statelessness, from colonial-era borders to modern migration crises. Can Southeast Asia balance state sovereignty with regional human rights obligations? How should citizenship be defined in an age of transnational movement? Delegates will negotiate frameworks for regional protection, explore models for inclusion, and reimagine what it means to belong. This committee calls not only for policy solutions, but for moral clarity in a region where millions live between nations, and outside the law.
Topic 2: The Role of Political Education in Post-Colonial States
What we teach about power shapes who dares to claim it. In post-colonial states, political education is more than just civics. Often, it is a battleground of memory, identity, and ideology. Should political education reinforce national unity or encourage dissent? Whose version of history becomes official, and whose is erased? In this committee, delegates will examine how Southeast Asian nations, each shaped by colonization, resistance, and rapid modernization, craft political consciousness in classrooms. From Singapore’s emphasis on social harmony to Indonesia’s post-authoritarian reforms, approaches vary widely. Delegates will debate curriculum design, state influence, and the role of political education in either building democracy or entrenching control. This topic invites delegates to think beyond textbooks and toward the future: how should the next generation be taught to lead, to question, and to remember? At its core, this committee explores not only how citizens are educated, but how nations are imagined.
-
Topic 1: Green Urban Development
Today, over half of the global population lives in a city, and that number is expected to reach over two-thirds by 2050. Urbanization is an inevitable part of a country’s economic development, and if well-planned, can foster a circular economy. More often, however, the current system incurs a high environmental cost: habitat loss, increased energy consumption, and air pollution. Urban centers not only play a large role in climate change but will experience the consequences up close as well. Rising temperatures exacerbate the heat island effect, and rising sea levels threaten the displacement of many residents in coastal cities. Impoverished communities suffer disproportionately due to the lack of adequate ways to combat these effects and the fact that they are often located in hazardous areas. Delegates should consider mixed land use, renewable energy implementation, and integration of artificial intelligence technologies, all while creating plans to ensure equal access to resources.
Topic 2: Implementation of Green Energy
In order to adhere to the global warming goal of 1.5°C, policymakers are moving more aggressively to reduce carbon emissions. The necessity of a switch to renewable energy is well-established; now, the focus turns towards implementation. Current barriers are faced in insufficient renewable grid infrastructure and the storage issue posed by the transient nature of most renewable energy sources. Additionally, renewable energy, as a popular method, has yet to extend to particular uses, specifically heating and transportation. Solar and wind power are currently the most developed and cost-effective, but are they always the best choice? What roles should the public and private sectors play? While answering these questions, delegates should also find ways to address energy storage, encourage investment, and consider how new technologies can improve energy efficiency.
-
Topic 1: Online Exploitation and Child Sex Trafficking in Southeast Asia
Southeast Asia has become one of the world’s fastest-growing digital regions, and one of the most dangerous for children online. As internet access expands, so do cases of grooming, child pornography, and sex trafficking coordinated through social media and encrypted platforms. Delegates will explore how UNICEF can work with governments, technology companies, and international organizations to combat these crimes. The discussion will challenge delegates to balance freedom of digital access with the urgent need for stronger victim protection and digital accountability.
Topic 2: Children in Conflict Zones and the Recruitment of Child Soldiers
Armed conflict continues to claim children as both victims and participants. In parts of Southeast Asia and beyond, thousands of children are forcibly recruited or coerced into serving as soldiers and laborers, leaving lasting physical and psychological trauma. Delegates will debate how UNICEF and its partners can strengthen international monitoring, rehabilitation programs, and reintegration initiatives for children affected by war. Delegates will also debate how community engagement and peacebuilding efforts can break the cycles that make children vulnerable to recruitment in the first place. The discussion will push delegates to design long-term solutions that restore both safety and hope for children growing up in war.
Economic and Social Councils (ECOSOCs)
Economic and Social Councils (ECOSOCs) are an organ of the United Nations coordinating global, cultural, and social environment. These are platforms for international change and innovation. Delegates will be challenged to innovate effective solutions for social change.
-
Topic 1: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence in Education
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is reshaping the global education landscape, with tools like ChatGPT and other generative models redefining how students learn, write, and think. While AI-driven tutoring platforms and automated grading systems have the potential to personalize instruction and reduce educational inequities, their widespread use also raises critical questions about academic honesty, critical thinking, and student engagement. In particular, educators have expressed concern that reliance on AI to complete assignments may hinder learning and contribute to declining attention spans among students. Moreover, disparities in digital access risk widening the gap between well-resourced and under-resourced institutions. As the world integrates AI into classrooms, the Commission on Science and Technology for Development must address how to harness these innovations responsibly to ensure that technology supplements, rather than substitutes, human learning and intellectual growth.
Topic 2: Strengthening Global Frameworks for Data Governance and Digital Privacy
The rise of artificial intelligence in military and security systems has sparked urgent global debate over ethics, accountability, and international stability. From autonomous drones and predictive surveillance to AI-driven command structures, technological progress has outpaced existing legal and humanitarian frameworks. The blurred line between human and machine decision-making poses unprecedented risks, particularly when AI operates in lethal or high-stakes scenarios without clear oversight. Beyond physical warfare, AI has become central to cyber warfare, where algorithms can detect vulnerabilities, manipulate information, or even launch digital attacks with minimal human input. At the same time, private companies increasingly control the data and infrastructure that power these technologies, raising pressing questions about whether and to what extent governments should regulate corporate use of data in national security contexts. As global powers and corporations continue to shape the future of AI, the Commission on Science and Technology for Development must examine how to balance innovation, privacy, and security in this rapidly evolving landscape.
-
Topic 1: Future of Connectivity in the ESCAP Region
The Asia-Pacific region today stands as a global hub for commerce and innovation, largely due to its increasingly interconnected economies. To build on this momentum, ESCAP economies are launching ambitious infrastructure projects, from developing vast Special Economic Zones to building mega-terminals at key aviation hubs and modernizing maritime ports. These initiatives aim to streamline the flow of goods, services, and people, fostering deeper socio-economic integration and unlocking new opportunities for growth. However, this rapid development presents significant challenges, including the need for immense capital investment, the risk of environmental degradation, social integration across a highly diverse region, and the difficulty of harmonizing regulations across diverse legal systems. Delegates must create a collaborative framework to guide these connectivity projects, ensuring that the benefits of integration are shared equitably and sustainably across the entire ESCAP region.
Topic 2: Disparity in National Educational Standards in ESCAP
While ESCAP is celebrated for its economic dynamism, a significant disparity persists in the educational standards and outcomes among its member economies. This gap is starkly illustrated by international benchmarks like the PISA rankings, where some ESCAP nations lead the world while others lag considerably behind. These differences stem from the varied economic stages of member nations, which in turn shape national educational goals, funding, and policy priorities. An unaddressed educational divide threatens to create a two-tiered system of opportunity, limiting human potential and hindering the region's collective long-term prosperity. The committee is tasked with exploring the root causes of this disparity and proposing collaborative solutions – such as knowledge-sharing platforms, teacher exchange programs, and cross-border scholarships – to create a more integrated and equitable educational landscape for the region.
-
Topic 1: Non-Communicable Diseases in Urbanizing Asia
With many countries and regions in Asia experiencing rapid urbanization, the rise in non-communicable diseases (NCDs)—such as diabetes, cancer, respiratory illnesses, and cardiovascular diseases—is cause for alarm. Factors that contribute to this include extreme levels of air pollution, lack of proper nutritious diets, sedentary lifestyles, and the lack of access to proper healthcare infrastructure. These factors are increasing public health issues in both developed and developing cities across Asia. This committee will delve into the possible collaborations of governments and international organizations, where delegates will be responsible for exploring the intersections of public health and international affairs to create feasible and applicable resolutions for tackling NCDs in Asia.
Topic 2: Regional Health Systems Post-COVID
Globally, the COVID-19 pandemic exposed numerous vulnerabilities, not only in emergency preparedness, but also in regional public health systems. We saw countries reacting quickly through policymaking and rapid mobilization efforts. However, there were numerous gaps in healthcare infrastructure. As we have shifted into the post-COVID era, countries in global regions have been working to rebuild their health systems to support their citizens and residents as well as mitigate future public health threats. In this committee, delegates will debate resolutions and collectively build plans to rebuild regional health systems, expand healthcare access, and ensure universal emergency preparedness.
Specialized Committees
Specialized committees are fast-paced committees geared towards delegates wishing to explore historical topics. Delegates must quickly negotiate, formulate, and enact lasting solutions for pressing issues as individuals in response to new information and updates.
-
Topic 1: Navigating Sovereignty, Trade, and Security in the South China Sea
In April 2025, tensions in the South China Sea reached a breaking point after years of disputes over reefs, shoals, and shipping lanes. On April 14, a Chinese Coast Guard vessel collided with a Philippine patrol ship near Scarborough Shoal, damaging both vessels and igniting outrage. Reports suggest that warning shots may have been fired, although both sides deny responsibility. The incident immediately halted regional shipping, stranding dozens of commercial vessels in contested waters. By the end of April, patrols and military exercises had multiplied, fishermen feared for their livelihoods, and oil exploration projects had been suspended. With nearly one-third of global trade flowing through the South China Sea, the stakes extend far beyond the region. ASEAN leaders face growing pressure to respond but remain divided on how to proceed. Meanwhile, external powers continue to monitor events closely, with some warning that further escalation could disrupt the global economy. This committee begins at a moment of crisis. The security, prosperity, and unity of Southeast Asia are at risk. Delegates must decide how to navigate competing claims and prevent open conflict in one of the most contested maritime regions in the world.
Topic 2: Building Collective Climate Resilience in Southeast Asia
Southeast Asia has recently endured some of the most intense heatwaves in its recorded history. In 2024, temperatures exceeded 53 °C in parts of the Philippines, breaking records and straining fragile power grids. Crops and reservoirs were severely affected, and multiple fatalities have occurred due to heatstroke. In Vietnam, the heatwave triggered planned blackouts in certain regions as electricity demand spiked, while extreme heat and drought contributed to reduced rice yields in several countries across the region. Cambodia, meanwhile, faced critically low Mekong River levels that threatened irrigation and raised concerns for future harvests. This crisis has heightened public concern and placed significant pressure on ASEAN to coordinate relief measures and long-term strategies, even as member states diverge between reliance on coal and palm oil exports and efforts to pursue greener investments. Without a stronger collective response, the region could face recurring cycles of ecological disruption, economic strain, and humanitarian emergencies. This committee begins in the middle of a developing environmental crisis. Delegates must determine how to respond to a climate emergency that has already cost lives, disrupted economies, and tested the limits of regional cooperation. Will ASEAN create a new collective strategy for resilience, or will national interests and short-term profits undermine its ability to act?
-
Topic 1: Rightful Ownership over the Preah Vihear Temple
The debate over the rightful ownership of the Preah Vihear Temple centers on the question of who truly deserves control over this sacred and culturally significant site. As deeply Buddhist nations, both Cambodia and Thailand are drawn to the temple not only for its religious symbolism but also for the nationalist sentiment it evokes. For Cambodia, the temple is a testament to its heritage as the successor of the Khmer Empire, which originally built the complex. Thailand, on the other hand, emphasizes its historical dominance over the region, including the temple, for centuries prior to the colonial era. The contention is rooted in each nation’s desire to assert a nostalgic vision of its past glory and territorial integrity, making the temple more than just an ancient monument, it becomes a symbol of national pride and identity.
Topic 2: Colonial Maps and Treaties
The dispute becomes even more complex when examined through the lens of colonial-era maps and treaties, particularly the Franco-Siamese Treaty of 1907. This agreement resulted in Thailand ceding the region surrounding the Preah Vihear Temple to French-controlled Cambodia. However, discrepancies between the treaty’s wording and the maps produced at the time have led to conflicting interpretations. Both sides have cited different maps, some of which include the temple within Thai territory and others placing it in Cambodia, to support their respective claims. A major point of contention is whether Thailand should be held to a treaty signed with a now-absent colonial power, especially when French negotiators may have exerted disproportionate influence. Nonetheless, Cambodia argues that Thailand’s lack of objection to French control over the temple for nearly five decades constitutes implicit recognition of Cambodian sovereignty, further solidifying its claim under international law.
-
Topic 1: Sustaining the Flame: The IOC’s Responsibility in Environmental Responsibility
The 2024 Paris Olympics marked a major milestone in the Games’ pursuit of environmental sustainability, producing an estimated 1.59 million tons of carbon emissions, roughly half the level of previous editions. Yet even this success revealed the scale of the challenge that remains. Transportation, tourism, and large-scale construction continue to generate massive emissions, while the push for renewable energy and eco-conscious design often clashes with the economic ambitions of host cities. The International Olympic Committee’s own charter calls on it to “encourage and support a responsible concern for environmental issues,” but its capacity to enforce such standards remains uncertain, especially as accountability remains weak within the organization. Should the IOC push for stricter sustainability requirements, even if that means downsizing events, limiting attendance, and spreading competitions across multiple cities, or will such changes erode the global spectacle that defines the Games? Delegates must determine whether the Olympic movement can truly embody the values of sustainability it promotes, or if environmental responsibility will remain an elusive ideal.
Topic 2: Navigating Corruption in the IOC Bidding Process
Over the past several decades, the Olympic bidding process has repeatedly come under scrutiny for allegations of bribery, vote manipulation, and undue political influence. Investigations into the selection of Rio de Janeiro and Tokyo as host cities revealed deep-rooted flaws that echo the corruption scandals of the 1990s, reigniting questions about transparency and fairness within the International Olympic Committee. The current system often encourages candidate cities to compete through ambitious and costly promises, a dynamic that economists have termed the “winner’s curse.” The result has frequently been inflated budgets, underused facilities, and public disillusionment with the very idea of hosting the Games. As the IOC seeks to restore confidence in its decision-making, several potential paths forward have emerged. Some suggest a more collaborative model in which the IOC works closely with a single candidate city from the outset to design Games aligned with local capacity and priorities. Others advocate for stronger external oversight, such as public voting records, independent audits, or stricter ethics regulations, to ensure accountability at every stage of selection. Delegates will need to evaluate these and other possible reforms, balancing the Olympic movement’s global ambitions with the principles of fairness, integrity, and long-term sustainability.
Crisis Committees
Crisis committees are fast-paced committees catering towards delegates wishing to be challenged. Delegates must quickly navigate communication with other delegates, create new solutions, and impact the committee’s flow through crisis arcs.
-
Topic 1: Regional Response to Currency Speculation and Financial Contagion
It’s July 2, 1997, and the government of Thailand has just made an announcement that has the potential of wiping almost a decade of economic progress in Southeast Asia and South Korea. The Thai administration has decided to float its currency (the baht), meaning it will no longer be pegged to the U.S. dollar. After massive speculative pressure from investors saying the baht was overvalued, as well as weak economic fundamentals and a depletion of foreign reserves, the Thai government was faced with the tough yet inevitable decision of parting ways with the backing of the American dollar. The Thai currency immediately tanked almost 20%, and the financial ripple effects are starting to be seen throughout other countries in the region. It is the job of regional leaders and economic policymakers to find ways of mitigating the impact so that this doesn’t scale into a full-blown collapse of the Asian financial system.
Topic 2: Role of Government versus Corporate Accountability amid Financial Collapse
A question now arises amid the shambles of what was once considered the “East Asian Miracle”: who should take responsibility for this collapse? The financial crisis has exposed the severe structural flaws in both government and private sector practices. Excessive lending, political-corporate collusion, and lack of transparency are at the root of this crisis, things that could have at least been mitigated had there been a higher degree of administrative scrutiny. Governments such as that of Thailand and Malaysia pegged their currencies to the dollar to attract foreign investment, even though their underlying economic structure wasn’t competitive enough to keep up. Corporations exploited the system by repeatedly using government-backed loans to clear their debts. Given this, we ask ourselves, should the governments be considered at fault for allowing such a deregulated market that exposed them to macroeconomic vulnerabilities, or should we pin the blame on corporations, who exploited weak financial oversight for personal profit?